by 3rdaverules0605 » Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:40 pm
by twerked » Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:29 am
by 3rdaverules0605 » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:04 pm
by IB_Surfer » Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:19 pm
by Spiney » Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:11 am
by IB_Surfer » Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:43 am
by Spiney » Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:50 am
by Brent » Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:27 am
by Spiney » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:11 pm
by IB_Surfer » Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:14 am
Spiney wrote:I am 23 and unfortunately I stopped growing up at least 6 years ago
Anyway, I will probably take a 5'10 then, and not 5'8. In fact I used to have a 5'10 fish and it felt alright for the size, I had to get rid of it because it was a beginner board and it was way too heavy, very stable but it wouldn't fly on the waves.
Brent, as you seem to be a fish lover, I have a question for you : how would you describe the feeling of a real retro shape fish (deep swallow tail, twin fin, etc.) compared to a modern fish ? As my shortboard already has common features with a modern fish, wouldn't it be smarter to get a truly different board ? What's more I feel attracted to those old lookin boards, they look fantastic and I think they would feel alright for the style I want to reach with a fish : smooth and fluid style with speed, but not too radical.
What do you think Master Fish ?
by Jimi » Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:16 am
by drowningbitbybit » Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:25 am
Jimi wrote: but in a 4-5ft wave the twin setup is tricky...
by Jimi » Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:53 am
by drowningbitbybit » Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:59 am
by twerked » Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:25 am
drowningbitbybit wrote:Soooooo.... the one's you missed were knee-high, but the one you were on was the mysterious, all on its own, shoulder high wave...? Hmmmm?![]()
by drowningbitbybit » Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:08 am
twerked wrote:though i hear fast, hollow tubes are where retro fish really shine because of the inherent quickness of the twin/quad fins and the deep swallow tail acts like a pintail to really hold the face.
by Brent » Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:20 am
by surferdude_scarborough » Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:44 pm
by twerked » Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:19 pm
drowningbitbybit wrote:twerked wrote:though i hear fast, hollow tubes are where retro fish really shine because of the inherent quickness of the twin/quad fins and the deep swallow tail acts like a pintail to really hold the face.
Um, are you joking?![]()
If not, then someone was with you. Fast and hollow is about the worst place you can put a retro fish. They dont have the rocker for that kind of wave, and the twin (or quad) fins will not hold a steep face.
Retro fish (any kind of fish, in fact) go best on relatively fat, slow waves. Thats what they're for...
nick carroll wrote:By the way: those who think the Fish is a mush-board don't have a clear impression of the true Fish design. The guys I know who ride 'em best don't really even get into 'em until they're at a long, fast, juicy pointbreak, where the flat-rocker speed effect can be used to its maximum. The best high-performance mush-board is a stubby version of the conventional hi-per shortboard; in mush, you need curves
4 days ago by Threeo3 comments
5 days ago by HaoleKook5 comments
7 days ago by BaNZ3 comments
16 days ago by rodr0drod5 comments
22 days ago by Ben795 comments
23 days ago by Applejack4 comments
24 days ago by Kulharin5 comments
27 days ago by Slindenkohl5 comments